Halloween - A Film Analysis
Halloween is a 1978 Slasher horror film, directed by John
Carpenter. The film was relatively cheap to make, with the combination of a
repeated, yet iconic soundtrack, unknown actors and no special effects or CGI,
it made the film immensely profitable. This film is credited to signal the
start of the Slasher genre, with famous films such as Friday the 13th,
Nightmare on Elm Street and Prom Night all loosely based on Halloween’s
narrative structure. However, most slasher films based their styles off the
Friday the 13th franchise for it’s barbaric and graphic murder
scenes. Eventually, the whole idea of the Slasher died down significantly until
the emergence
The film is set in the remote suburban town of Haddonfield,
Illinois, the remoteness of the town rereinforces the idea of isolation,
loneliness and the concept of ‘no escape’. It’s set at the time of Halloween
night in 1963, where a young, 6-year old Michael Myers (Will Sandin) brutally
murders his older teenage sister, Judith Myers (Sandy Johnson), after she
partakes in sexual activity with her boyfriend. It’s this type of promiscuous
activity that results in her death, which reflects the dominant ideology at the
time, that middle class girls who work hard are rewarded, compared those who
are involved with sex, alcohol and drug use – a strong link with death. After
the murder, Michael is seen walking in a child Halloween costume of a clown.
This reflects a potential innocence of the child, that what he did was perhaps
an accident. The fact that he is only 6 years old also signifies an innocence
to the character. The film then advances fifteen years, into 1978, creating a
modern discourse for the audience. Michael escapes from the mental hospital he
has spent the previous 15 years. The prominence of the date of Halloween Michael,
as the anniversary of his sister’s murder looms close. This, is essentially the
disruption of the equilibrium, as the escape leads Michael into the real world,
causing havoc and manipulating minds at every corner. At this point we meet
Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis), a college student, is being stalked by
Michael. After strange sightings of this masked man, Laurie spots Michael in
her backyard, peering into her bedroom window. By this point, it’s Halloween
night, the night Michael seemingly, has some unfinished business, his
motivations and intentions to do so, are kept a secret from the audience, to
maintain a sense of mystery, and to keep things “behind a mask”. As Laurie
babysits, her college friend Annie also babysits. Annie receives a caul off her
boyfriend to pick him up, and in doing so, drops the child she’s babysitting to
Laurie’s house. Lurking in the neighbourhood is Michael, with Annie being
Michael first victim of the night by murdering her in her car. The death of
Annie is accompanied by the death of Laurie’s other friends Lynda and Bob, who
together, are involved in sexual relations and activity. These deaths, weren’t
intentional, just make-way, with Laurie being Michael’s primary target. Michael
enters the household with the attempt to murder Laurie, through several failed
attempts of killing Michael, Dr. Loomis intervenes with a pistol, firing gun
shots to the head and chest of Michael, falling of the balcony in the process.
As Dr. Loomis takes a second look at Michael’s ‘dead’ body, Michael is gone,
with the non-diegetic sound of his breathing in the background and a shared
suspicion that Michael could be anywhere.
Halloween has a unique and brilliant narrative structure and
it’s possible it can be related to the Bulgarian theorist Tzvetan Todorov and
his idea of the Classic Hollywood Narrative (CHN). The Classic Hollywood
Narrative compromises of 5 different stages of a how a narrative progresses.
Firstly, is the equilibrium, a state of normality, where everything is as it
should be. Secondly, an event, someone or something disrupts this equilibrium,
this sense of stability. The disruption, also known as disequilibrium, cause a
series or chain of events, prompting a path to resolution. The path being to
restore the equilibrium, changing things back to how they once were. This
disequilibrium is eventually sold towards the end of the tale creating a new
equilibrium. Although the beginning and new equilibrium may not be the same,
they are both significantly better than the disequilibrium, making the
narrative end on a more positive note.
Whether Halloween applies to the CHN is fairly difficult to
discuss as there is no clear definition of what the disruption to the
equilibrium is. If it goes by the order of the film, it would be Mike Myers
murdering his sister back in 1963, which is the event that makes Michael Myers
the barbaric character he is. Or, the disruption could be Michael escaping the
hospital/asylum, which in turn, creates the rest of the film, without Michael
escaping, these events or majority of the film wouldn’t of happened. However,
if it wasn’t for the initial event of Michael murdering his sister, he may not
have gone to the asylum in the first place, meaning he may not have targeted
Laurie several years later. Going by the latter option, of the escape being the
disruption, Halloween abides by the Classic Hollywood Narrative. The
equilibrium being the night before Halloween, Laurie is studying hard and there’s
an ongoing discussion and hype around the college’s ball. There seems to be a
significant peace within the town, with people looking forward to Halloween
night. The disruption to the equilibrium is Michael Myers escaping the hospital
in Smith’s Grove, by stealing the car, when he was meant to be taken to a court
hearing. Upon his escape, Dr Loofis warns several people about the escapee and
the possible dangers he can bring to Haddonfield, especially on the personally
historic occasion of Halloween for Myers. After multiple stalking occurrences,
Laurie realizes that this figure is a potential threat to her and her fellow
friends. The series events that followed are the murders of her friends,
prompting the path to resolution, to kill or escape Mike Myers. Eventually,
Mike Myers is killed… well, supposedly. This new equilibrium as such can be
seen a sequel bait, with the mystery of where Michael can be, it leaves the
audience on a cliff-hanger, maintaining this horror aspect of unknowing and
mystery.
Another theorist that looked into narrative structure is
Vladimir Propp. Propp believed that every character had a purpose, and as such,
devise 8 different character roles that are seen in most narratives. He
conducted his studies upon old Russian folk tales, and the same principle can
be applied to film narratives, in particular, Halloween.
The villain in this film is clearly defined, Michael Myers.
He’s the one who needs to be stopped, creates a sense of fear not only to other
character, but to the audience too. Several murders, secretive nature and urge
to kill all anchor the term villain to Michael Myers name. The hero in this
case is Laurie. She successfully protects the children she’s babysitting as
well as miraculously surviving the wrath of Michael Myers. Laurie is an
androgynous character, fairly masculine, she’s a hard working student and not
seen partaking in any adult activities (with spoking a joint being an
exception, yet reflective of teenagers in the 1970’s), Laurie clearly reflects
the dominant ideology of the time and is a strong symbol of the ‘ideal
Americans’, to work hard and you will succeed. The donor and helper in this case
can be considered as Dr. Loofis, essentially, if it wasn’t for his
intervention, Laurie could have easily been murdered. He knows the story of
Mike Myers, and perhaps is aware of some of his intentions. The helping aspect
is the shooting of Myers, aiding the hero her life.
Claude Levi Strauss looked at narrative structure in a
different way, in terms of binary oppositions. The opposite values reveals the
structure of media texts. In the case of, Halloween, there is a clear
opposition of Good v Evil. The evil nature is obvious with Michael Myers, with
him being credited as ‘pure evil’ and a tendency to kill. The good, indicates
Laurie, in one sense, she is good as she survives and protects the vulnerable
children, and in the other sense, she is good in terms of her actions and
attitudes. With her being and androgynous, virginal, work-orientated character,
she correctly reflects the dominant ideology at the time of the film. It also
relates to the Structural Consensus Theory, in that a person of middle class
value education more than those of a lower class, of whom alcohol, drugs and
sex seems to be the priority.
Halloween uses flashbacks as part of a narrative technical
technique to manipulate our awareness of time and place. This idea of narrative
was brought to fruition by Bordwell and Thompson, although they didn’t fully
come up with a narrative idea or structure, they came up with several important
ideas. The effect of the flashback to 1963 in the Judith Myers murder scene is
used to establish the character of Michael Myers, signifying that he has
tendencies to kill and despite his young age, is pure evil. The text of “15
year later” anchors the fast forward in time, that we have moved 15 years from
1963 to 1978. B&T also explored the notion of cause and effect, that the
audience links a problem or a cause and make a connection to the effect. Even
if there is no obvious connection, we still try to establish one.
There are 3 distinctions of time within a film. The screen
duration, plot duration and the story duration. For Halloween, the screen
duration is 91 minutes, the plot duration is about 2 days (Oct. 30/31) and the
story duration is over 15 years. Although the murder scene from 1963, the
remaining 15 years are not shown, indicating that Michael has been in the
psychiatric hospital for this duration. The actual main plot duration of the
film is from October 30 1978 – October 31 1978, and the 1963 is a flashback
notifying the audience of the story of Michael Myers.
Halloween successfully abides by the two theories of the
Male Gaze and The Final Girl.
The Male Gaze, a
theory by Laura Mulvey, is the notion of woman being portrayed in a sexual or
provocative manner, which is tailored for the male audience’s pleasure. In this
case, Laurie’s friends are seen wearing short skirt, crop tops and are seen
experimenting in sexual acts. This criteria satisfies a male-dominated audience,
and although these ideas may be made intentionally or unintentionally, they
still support Mulvey’s theory that woman displayed ion a slightly sexualised
manner appeal to men.
The Final girl theory reveals that the most manly, sensible
and essentially, the cleverest girl survives a particular event. In this case,
Laurie is the final girl as she is the one who survives Michael Myer’s spree.
The reason behind Laurie’s survival is that she is a virginal, androgynous
character. She is not seen discussing sex and is portrayed in a masculine
style. One prime example of this is when Annie suggests Laurie going to the
college ball with Ben Tramer, Annie decides to take matters into her own hands
and contacts Ben about the date, after hearing the news, Laurie immediately
calls the date off, stating she’s not interested. This reflects the ideology
that Laurie isn’t focused on promiscuous acts, and instead values her
education. This is also evident, when she forgets her Chemistry text book, and
is in desperate need of it back. Laurie survives as she doesn’t have sex, young
teens in the 1970’’s were experimenting with sex, and this was frowned upon by
elders, going against their ideology, that education should be valued before
sex. As a result, Halloween reflects a “reactionary sexual agenda”, meaning
that those who have sex are killed, maintaining a strong connection between sex
and death. Laurie’s friends Annie, bob and Lynda are a killed for their
actions. However, they died for being a distraction, Laurie was always
Michael’s No.1 target.
No comments:
Post a Comment